"Innovation, investment, customer focus and great products have led to Intels success over the years. These are the things that have been fundamental to our decision making as we´ve sought to move the industry and the pace of technology forward." so Bruce Sewell, von Intel.
"Likewise, AMD has made its own business decisions and choices that have determined its position in the marketplace. Yet, with its lawsuit, AMD seeks to instead blame Intel for the many business failures AMD has experienced that are actually a direct result of AMDs own actions or inactions."
"AMDs choices and behaviors with respect to each of these core principles over the period covered by the complaint provide a compelling answer to the allegations it has made in this case."
"AMDs complaint presents a case study in legal dissonance. Although AMD has purportedly brought its complaint to promote competition, its true aim is the opposite. Under the cover of competition law, AMD seeks to shield itself from competition. AMD seeks to impede Intels ability to lower prices and thereby to allow AMD to charge higher prices. AMDs colorful language and fanciful claims cannot obscure AMDs goal of shielding AMD from price competition."
Was soll denn der Spam? @ Topic: Die Zeit wird es zeigen wer recht oder unrecht hat... Die meisten werden kaum genug Hintergrundinfos haben um eine 100% sichere Aussage zum recht oder nicht zu treffen. Aufgrund der bis jetzt öffentlich vorliegender Erkentnisse, könnte ich mir aber durchaus vorstellen dass AMD nicht umsonst klagt...
3) Gast (04.09.2005, 12:19 Uhr)
wow, der tommy teilt ganz gewaltig aus! also amd hat da gewaltig was auf die fresse gekriegt!